Rather the DNA is from one animal only. What of the relationship to the individual supplying the DNA? Less than a month after President Bush announced his decision on embryonic stem cell research observers noted that the substance of public debate had shifted from whether such research was ethical to a debate about whether essential biomedical research could be conducted in the United States.
The writers themselves are very diverse, as they have almost every imaginable qualification to their names, in all fields and at all levels.
The subjects in cloning experiments are not high-minded adventurers, heroic explorers, dedicated scientists, not even the desperate terminally ill or grievously afflicted or those showing their altruism by joining researchers in the quest to relieve suffering through biomedical experimentation. Such opponents point out that the process by which to clone mammals, let alone humans, is not yet perfected and could result in severely malformed and stillborn children.
And while research continues, we can work toward addressing the ethical issues regarding human cloning by developing professional codes of conduct and governmental regulation where necessary in order to minimize potential abuse, just as we did regarding organ transplantation and initial fears that organ transplantation would create black markets in organs.
So that would mean creating cloned embryos, implanting them and destroying those that look imperfect as they grow in the womb. Some of these safeguards already exist. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction. For most individuals it is normal to honor and appreciate the choice our parents made for us in deciding to conceive and bring us into the world.
Conclusion In experimentation on human beings, the basic principles of human society apply. Are we willing to risk that? As always, you must read the question carefully to make sure you answer it fully and do not go off topic.
Despite confusion about scientific and technical issues, there is widespread public awareness of predictions that human cloning and stem cell research could provide treatments and cures for many diseases, if scientists are allowed the freedom to pursue all promising pathways.
How it is performed and the results that may follow, however, are new. For example, the use of cloning may allow us to develop ways to culture replacement tissues and bodily fluids that can be used to treat individuals without the usual difficulties of HLA matching and tissue rejection.
However, prohibiting human cloning closes off the opportunity to ever reach the point of eliminating the possibility of failure or reducing it to acceptable levels. Therefore, rather than futilely attempting to prevent human cloning because of the evils that might spring from it, we should, as we have done with other new technologies and ideas, embrace it for the benefits and new knowledge that will emanate from it, all the while doing the best we can to minimize abuses.
According to some researchers, stem cell research may provide breakthroughs in the treatment of spinal cord injury and repair and a way to overcome the debilitating effects of many neurological disorders. However, scientists generally agree that human reproductive cloning should not be permitted before the scientific and technical issues have been clarified.
The reason is clear: However if it is used in an appropriate manner, it will contribute lots of pros to the world. The Risks of Cloning Some advance the argument that human cloning may be premature at this time, but scientific progress might reach the point of removing or offsetting the risk.
When man attempts to play God, it can never turn out well. Such legislation, most likely enacted out of political expediency in the face of the offensive factor, likely will do little to prevent determined researchers and advocates of human cloning from going forward with experimentation abroad.
Yes, because of the potential physical dangers and the profound ethical dilemmas it poses, the cloning of human beings should be prohibited. Although many take the moral of the story to concern the ramifications of disobeying the command of God, we also can see that it represents the ramifications of new knowledge.
Indeed, in the early s, when in vitro fertilization IVF began on human beings, many in society—including medical professionals—opposed it vehemently on moral and ethical grounds.
Normally, there should be around words per page. Even if a few cloned babies are born apparently normal we will have to wait up to 20 years to be sure they are not going to have problems later for example, growing old too fast.Essays supporting human cloning published by the Human Cloning Foundation Should Human Cloning Be Allowed?
by LiShing L. Cloning Cloning by Jill W. Esmaeili's Pro-Human Cloning Essay; Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned by Jason B.
Jason K.'sPro-Human Cloning Essay. Human Cloning: the process wherein human embryo are allowed to be divided and then separate them and allowed to developed into two embryos with identical genes which could become identical human beings. /5(2). Free Essay: Leidy Escobar 11/15/ Three Reasons Why Cloning Should Not Be Allowed Cloning is the process of creating a genetic duplicate of a human being.
This paper evaluates the ethical concerns of human cloning and justifies why human cloning should not be allowed in both ethical view and nursing point of view.
The issue at hand is should human cloning be allowed in a society that seeks immortality in the name of science. I believe cloning is an evolutionary dead end and the use of cloning techniques to make ideal human would ultimately devalue life.
Cloning (Argumentative Essay Sample) May 16, by This is the subject of this brief essay which takes the position that cloning is unethical and should not be allowed in the society.
Cloning involves producing a group of cells or organisms that are identical, and which all originate from the same primary organism. Human beings should.Download